Disagreement Without Fragmentation

QLens should preserve meaningful disagreement inside the research graph instead of forcing premature consensus or creating disconnected copies.

Competing models, conflicting evidence, and alternative reasoning paths can coexist when their relationships and statuses are explicit. This allows the repository to show not only that disagreement exists, but where it exists.

Forking may sometimes be necessary, especially when governance or scope diverges. Even then, shared OIDs, provenance, and explicit lineage should preserve the relationship between histories where possible.

The goal is not harmony. The goal is inspectable disagreement.